🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding that comments made by ESPN commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the New York major last eight. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But come on. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world entering this week’s year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive strength on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is often helpless. The last several seasons has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting grand slams when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the All England Club last four in July.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, extending the run to the brink of agony. When he finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend excessive energy to win it. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a result of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was fairly ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {